Framework
One place for every lead: a simple CRM in the UK
The quote is in the chat, the inbox, and a notebook on the passenger seat. You changed the phone number in one of them. You'd need a minute you don't have to say which.
Put every new name on one list before the end of the day, and stop adding to the others.
A simple CRM in the UK is that list on your phone, between jobs. Name it. Point every front door at it.
Retire the other lists as places you add new names. Tuesday morning then starts with a list you believe.
Where leads actually arrive
Write the front doors down before you buy or rearrange anything. For a small service firm they are usually some of these.
- A form on the website.
- A chat on the website.
- A phone call, including the one you take while you are driving.
- An email to a personal address as well as the shared one.
- A text message.
- A name scribbled during a visit, or passed on by a customer.
- A social message, if you reply to those.
Each door feels small. Together they're why the admin multiplies. The chat sits in the chat tool.
The form sits in email. The call sits in your head until you park. The text sits on a phone nobody else can open.
That's a set of waiting rooms, not a list. The notebook that says "call Dave" is fun until you remember you know four Daves.
AdviserAlly answers your website visitors and tells you who needs a reply. Saving leads into the CRM comes with the Solo plan. That's the shape of the outcome.
You still choose the fields, and you still close the side doors. The product doesn't know about the notebook in the van until you empty it in.
If you're choosing between a chat window and a form, the comparison is in chatbot or contact form. Whichever you pick, both should land on the same list. A second tool with its own private inbox brings the paste back.
Ten minutes: write every front door you use, including the personal inbox.
The copy-and-paste tax
Copying a lead feels quick. You highlight a name, you drop it into a sheet, you mean to add the rest later. The tax shows up as gaps.
The phone number never makes it across. The question they asked gets shortened until it is wrong. Two people paste the same enquiry and both think they own the reply. A week later you ring a person who has already booked, or you miss the one who has been waiting.
GOV.UK's data protection overview says that if you store customer details, you keep them secure, accurate and up to date, and you tell people who you are and how you'll use their information. A paste that drops a digit is an accuracy problem. A lead copied into a tool you forgot you had is a harder story to tell honestly.
There's a security side too. The NCSC's small organisations guide, published on 9 April 2026 and reviewed on 21 July 2026, says there are 5.5 million small organisations in the UK with between 0 and 49 employees, and that 1 in 2 small businesses suffer a cyber incident every year. It says cyber security is everyone's business, and that you don't need to be a technical expert to work through its recommendations.
A lead scattered across a personal inbox, a chat login and a spreadsheet attachment is more places to protect, including a phone that left with someone who no longer works here. One list, opened only by the people who update it, is a smaller surface. The NCSC guide is where the backup and account steps live.
Ten minutes: take one lead from yesterday and check the phone number is the same in every place it appears.
A framework for one live list
Work through the steps in order. Skip one and the old habit returns.
| Step | What you do | Finished when |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Name the list | One tool is the live record. Say its name out loud to the team. | Everyone can point to it |
| 2. List every front door | Chat, form, phone, email, text, visit, social. Include the personal inboxes. | The list is written down |
| 3. Set the fields | Who, contact, door, what they asked, what you promised, status, owner, date updated. | A new lead can be added in one minute |
| 4. Write status in words | Use New, Waiting on you, Waiting on them, Booked, Closed. | No blank status, and no colour-only dots |
| 5. Point every door at the list | The form notifies the list. The chat transcript is copied the same day. Calls are typed before you forget. | A test lead from each door appears once |
| 6. Give each lead one owner | The owner updates the record. Others can read it. | Two people are not both "on it" |
| 7. Retire the side lists | Old sheet and notebook stay as history. New names go only to the live list. | You can say the date you stopped adding to them |
| 8. Correct on the day | A new number, a cancelled visit, a wrong name: edit the live record the day you learn it. | The weekly check finds no contradiction |
Eight steps is the whole framework. You can run it in a week if the doors are few. The step people skip is step 7.
They build the new list and keep pasting into the old one "just in case". Two live lists and you're guessing again.
Ten minutes: say the name of the live list out loud, and write the date you'll stop adding names anywhere else.
Accuracy is a duty, not a preference for tidiness
The ICO's accuracy guidance says personal data has to be accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date. A status of "Booked" on a job the customer cancelled is misleading, so you update it the day you learn. A neighbour's "they want a quote" goes on with the source.
It doesn't go on as a confirmed booking. The definition of inaccurate, the London address example, and how to label an opinion are in the FAQ.
What counts as a reasonable step depends on the stakes. A wrong phone number on a cleaning quote is annoying. A wrong fact in a financial advice file can matter much more.
A financial advice firm should read the sector guide A CRM for UK financial advisers: a sector guide beside this framework, because the everyday list and the suitability file are different records. Cleaning firms have a similar split between the enquiry and the job sheet, in the cleaning company quote guide. Any other firm can use the same split between the enquiry and the job record.
GOV.UK adds the customer-facing half. People can ask to see what you hold and to correct it if it's wrong. One list makes that request possible to answer. Five partial copies make it a hunt, and the hunt is where you miss the outdated number.
Ten minutes: find one cancelled job that still says "Booked" and correct the status.
What a simple CRM in the UK should capture
The fields in step 3 are enough for follow-up. Resist the extra columns that nobody fills in.
Capture:
- The name they gave, spelled as they gave it.
- One phone number and one email, with room to mark an old one as historical.
- The door: chat, form, call, email, text, visit, or social.
- The ask, in a sentence. "End of tenancy clean for a two-bed flat, wants a date in May."
- The promise. "We said we would call by 5pm with a price."
- The status, in the five words from the table.
- The owner.
- The date the record changed.
Leave out, until you have a real reason:
- A score you invented for how keen they seemed.
- A second copy of the whole email thread, pasted in full, when a link or a short note will do.
- Special category details they did not need to give you for the job. GOV.UK's point on purpose sits underneath this: you are using the information to reply and to do the work. Collect what that needs.
Opinions need a label. The ICO rule on that is in the FAQ. "Owner's note: asked us to wait until Friday" is a fact about the conversation. "Difficult customer" is an opinion, and it doesn't belong on a shared list.
Ten minutes: delete one column nobody has filled in this month.
How the doors join the same list
Make each door boring.
Website form. The form alert should create the lead, or the person who reads it adds the row before they do anything else. The form and the list should ask for the same fields, so you are not retyping a different shape of name.
Website chat. The transcript ends with the name, the ask and the contact detail, or it ends with "they did not leave details". Add that summary the same day. If the bot already collected the fields from the ten questions you taught it, you are copying a summary, not reconstructing a conversation from memory.
Phone. You will forget the detail if you wait until evening. Add the lead before the next call, even if the note is two lines.
You can enrich it later. You cannot recover a number you did not write down.
Email and text. If they arrive in a personal inbox, forward or copy them to the list and reply from the shared path when you can. The personal inbox is a door, not the record.
Visit and word of mouth. The notebook is allowed in the van. It is emptied into the list the same day, and the page is marked as transferred. The notebook is not a second CRM.
Run one test lead through every door. If any door produces two records, or none, fix that door before you announce the list. You'll tell yourself you'll paste the rest in later. Later is where names go to sit.
Ten minutes: send yourself one test enquiry from the form and one from the chat, and see if each appears once.
The Friday check
Once a week, ten minutes is enough.
Open each door and look at new messages since the last check. Every one of them should already be on the list. Add any that are missing, then decide how that door will stop being a private store.
Read the rows in "Waiting on you". If the date has passed, the status is now misleading, and the ICO's accuracy principle is your cue to correct it. Book the work, send the reply, or move the status to "Waiting on them" or "Closed" with a sentence on why.
Check owners. A lead with no owner is a lead everyone assumes someone else has.
That Friday check is also how the list becomes the morning follow-up. Who to call next picks up from a list that's already complete. A follow-up system on top of three inboxes just speeds up the gaps.
The better Friday is specific. You open the list. Yesterday's chat, form and missed call are already there, each with an owner.
The notebook on the seat has a line through the names you typed in. You know who is waiting before you start the van.
The list you still open next month has less in it than the brochure suggested. One list. Eight steps.
Status in words. A correction on the day you learn the fact. Side lists closed.
Ten minutes: compare this week's doors with the list and add the one enquiry that only exists in a personal inbox.
Common questions
Do I have to throw away old notebooks and inboxes?
Keep them as history and stop adding new leads to them. The ICO's accuracy guidance says a historical record can stay accurate if you're clear it's history. Their example: a record that someone currently lives in London is wrong after they move, and a record that they once lived in London can stay. Label the old sheet 'closed on [date], history only'. A second live list will drift from the first.
What does the ICO mean by an accurate lead?
The accuracy page quotes the UK GDPR: personal data shall be accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date, and every reasonable step must be taken to erase or rectify inaccurate data without delay. In practice the ICO says you take reasonable steps to keep data accurate, make the source and status clear, consider challenges, and consider whether it needs a periodic update. 'Inaccurate', in the Data Protection Act 2018 wording the ICO cites, means incorrect or misleading as to any matter of fact. If you didn't collect the detail yourself, the ICO says you record it accurately, record the source, take reasonable steps to check it, and don't treat an unverified claim as fact. A record of an opinion isn't inaccurate just because the person disagrees, but it must say that it's an opinion and whose opinion it is. What counts as a reasonable step depends on the stakes.
What is the smallest set of fields?
Name and contact, where the lead came from, what they asked, what you promised, a status in words, an owner, and the date the record last changed.
What if two people update the same lead?
One owner makes the edit. The other can read it. The ICO says that if you learn a detail is wrong, you correct the record. One editor means one correction.
Is a simple list enough for a regulated advice file?
Use the list for the enquiry and the follow-up, in any business. If the firm is a financial adviser, suitability records follow the FCA Handbook retention rules, covered in the sector guide on this site. The everyday list points to that file. It does not replace it.
How often should I check the list is complete?
Once a week, compare the places leads arrive with the list. Any enquiry that exists only in a personal inbox gets copied in, and that inbox stops being the live record.